Airtel

Gidi Up

Gidi Up

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Weird question of the day...

Let me ask you guys a weird question. Hope no one would be offended by it. Someone just asked me and it took me a while to give an answer, so I thought to bring it here. Here's the question...

Live a jet set life, have mansions in two different countries, own a private jet, wear only designer outfits, friends with presidents, captains of industries, celebrities, have more money than you know what to do with it...and then die at age 40.
OR
Live poor till you turn 30 years old and then become paralyzed from the waist down after a tragic accident. You will depend on others to take care of you for the rest of your life...you will still live poor but the best part is; you will live to the ripe old age of 80.

Which would you choose?

778 comments:

1 – 200 of 778   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Screw that, give me age 40!

Anonymous said...

ha dis kin questn en

BONARIO NNAGS said...

mehn this question is somehow sha,but if I'll die at 40 and make heaven no problem.
coz the lack and not love of money is the root of all evil.

~BONARIO~says so via NOKIA3310

Anonymous said...

None of the above
Omalicha

Faith Kel said...

hmmm...
www.faithkel.com

Anonymous said...

Jet life!

bee said...

None!!!...moreover,d chances of it happening is slim...so no,tnx

Anonymous said...

Its better to be a king 4 a day than a servant 4 a year

odobo grace said...

A tough one!
Won't answer now, let's c what others got!

★★PRINCE CHARMING™★★ said...

Although such a situation CAN'T EVER come up to pick between those choices, but if I have to pick, I will go with the first option, the good life option, for sure!

nk ora said...

Na waoo this one hard ooo. But I ll prefer d 1st o jare

mamaBaby said...

Glad to go @ 40. Ain't how long but how well!

Anonymous said...

None of the above I'll say...I like the kinda life 'm living and I know I'd be rich one day.

Anonymous said...

Omo dats a big Q tho! Ha I dnt want any! Die at 40? Get paralyzed and be poor till 80? God forbid omo I dnt want any! Btw 1st 2 comment

Hot Igbo Girl said...

Men like money... no doubt

kele said...

Linda the person that asked u this question is the person a witch or wizard. Pls I will like to know. Abeg stay clear from the person

e bonto said...

Dis is like "THE DEVIL AND A DEEP BLUE SEA"but d first life may b better.

Make-Up by Teju Tobun said...

Option A....life is short after all, no one really knows tomorrow sef, please i rather live like Royalty, and yes, be prepared to go @ 40, having served God as well!....shortlife and prosperity, better pass Longlife and poverty and affliction and paralysis.

Anonymous said...

hmm...this is tough one oooo....wont pick any...

Anonymous said...

Option one ofcourse. 40 isn't a bad age to die at. And with that option, you'd live happy and die happy. Option 2 is a total NO! You'll even be begging to God to take your life at 15 not totalk to 80

DATSHAPIBOBOY said...

I choose none. D best option is to live ur life, play ur parts upon fortune stage n let d almighty decide.
Comment Signed, Sealed and Delivered by DatShapIboBoy

Anonymous said...

From the choices living poor and disabled is the worst thing that can ever happen to someone. So better choice enjoy and groove die at 40. Nigerians need awareness on disabilities/disabled people .They might be poor and have people care for them does not mean they are unhappy.

Anonymous said...

Ummm, 40 please. Without the paralyzed part I would have said live poor. The question can also be if you'd rather be rich and paralyzed a la bob guccione (penthouse) or poor and healthy till 80. Coz the poor and paralyzed is just too terrible...

Mama ifu

pealie said...

Im not really scared of death but i don't want a painful death. There were days, i just wanna sleep and rest in peace!

Anonymous said...

is that a question? die at age 40 johhh

Anonymous said...

is that a question? die at age 40 johhh

Anonymous said...

One of the worst things in life is to be a liability to people around you...

Anonymous said...

And it took you a while to answer? What ever happened to "not how far but how well"? What's the point being alive and a burden to others when you can die quick and bless people even after you die? Well me I want the best of both sides... Long life n prosperity :-)

Bill said...

this one is dead easy* in simon cowell voice* give me forty yrs joor....forty too much self.....nigeria life expectancy is it not 45?

Anonymous said...

This isn't a hard one at at all. I would happily die young than be useless... Waist down??? Do you know what that means?!? No below the belt activity?!? ... Hell no!

Gistyinka Blog said...

sis what is this kind of question... am unable to pick any one from this joor...

GLAM ME PRO said...

NONE.... Ishi emebiri the person that asked u this question. why will anyone who made clean money die at 40? Such big moni nd dying early is for ritualists Biko. As for the paralysis aspect, why are u alive if u can't do nothing and ur life would be at d mercy of others. I say NONE!!

Anonymous said...

Hmmmmm,Na wa for u ooooo. Am a lady though(meemee).

liz A said...

Of what use am I to mankind and myself if am poor and depend on others???

I rather live a fulfilled life.

The Bible says riches are blessings and poverty is a curse!!!

Anonymous said...

which would you choose?

Anonymous said...

Goldie died at 30 ... She lived her life to the fullest before she died. I would never tell the one I want ... Make some Wisin ... Wisin here no put Amen for me. But you know the one I want naw *Wink*

ugo said...

Let me be rich in christ and die at 40

iyeomon okhueleigbe said...

I'll be rich and live long amen!I dnt knw abt u!!

trilowilly said...

methuselah lived for 969years but that was the only story we heard about him in the bible. jesus lived for 33 yrs and he made a positive impact on earth.so short and sensible is better than long and stupid

Anonymous said...

40 is way better ... its not how far its always about how well you live your Life

Anonymous said...

To Start with, the part suppose to be 3 to 4

However, first is good for the following reason:
1. God created us to make good impact
2. It's not good to be a burden on someone
3. Note: Jesus & Muhammad, Gandhi, etc live humble life but these days you need plenty money to survive.
etc
So first option is mine.

MAXIMUS™ said...

I will choose the first option over and over and over again!

Anonymous said...

LIFE is beautiful when there is money in it.
My answer is "option A" without hesitation.

oh baby said...

LindY pls next questn abeg. Dt person dt asked u dis isn't normal or d person must ve dipped his/her hand in shady biz who's lookin 4 a way out. Any which way, dis isn't pleasant at all

Anonymous said...

Nada...

Anonymous said...

Which one did u choose Linda?
If u like, don't post my comment. Na u sabi.

Anonymous said...

D 1st one oooooo .

Anonymous said...

I would pick option A. Cuz, the reason why we are on Planet Earth is PURPOSE and not how Long u live. Like yours Keji, is feeding our minds with lovely info n sumtimes interesting junk. (LoL. We sumtimes eat Junk food, dont we?). Well, Sitting on a wheelchair n depending on others would make my achieving PURPOSE much more Harder. I daresay it wld be eaiser to live out my dreams with Money n Comfort. The more better if these continue in the afterlife.

Anonymous said...

None. Rubbish unrealistic question. None none. People enjoy n still live long. Very unintelligent question. M so angry with dis nonsense linda.

Anonymous said...

Linda I don't need to think abt this oh! I would rather live well and die early than the other way around.

Anonymous said...

None, Linda.
~D great anonymous!

Anonymous said...

There must b option C

Anonymous said...

Still thinking....

Elizabeth Tow said...

I REJECT BOTH OF THEM IN JESUS NAME

MORAYO FAYEUN said...

Wait make i sitdon laff dis laff sef...
. <=D н̍̊̍̊α̇̇̇α̍̍̊..н̍̊̍̊α̇̇̇α̍̍̊..н̍̊̍̊α̇̇̇α̍̍̊
> нααα..​нααα..нαα
^ ^ ‎ н̲̣̣̣α̣̣̣̣α̣̣̣..н̲̣̣̣α̣̣̣̣α̣̣̣..н̲̣̣̣α̣̣̣̣α̣̣̣
Dis question na die ooo! I no wan die young nd I wan get money!!!....HMmmmmMmmM #lemme think

Anonymous said...

sincerely i will go for the first option cos the second is just a useless and wasted life. @ least d family that would be left behind will not suffer.

effedua Emma jnr said...

well, u can't live forever. omo 40 yrs long sef.

Omorodion MLK Martin said...

The first pls,living the life to die @ 40 if heaven is made is better. We have to put heaven into consideration oo.
Why die sick when you have a choice to be healthy and live large . After all whether rich or poor you must die someday .

Milly GUO said...

None!!! Thank you.

NKECHI said...

I would stick to my up and down life. Thank you. I won't choose any.

Anonymous said...

Someone asked u this and it took u a while to reply? ????
Only if i am a lazy, self centered person, will i think of the options before I answer that question.
Let me interpret your question.
Now u r asking if I want to live a short life,wealthy and the possibility of helping others with my wealth and connections
Or
live a long life, poor and a burden to the caring uncaring people around me with my poverty and disability?

Anonymous said...

Live rich and powerful. Same choice was given to Alexander the Great and till today, his name is still known.

fej said...

None oo linda,dis options re mean jor

Anonymous said...

Thot after bn paralysed money go come. Sha,I choose none.

Anonymous said...

Linda...I bind you in Jesus name.I shall live till 80yrs,rich and satisfied to the glory of God...so these scenarios shall never my portion ��

Anonymous said...

I'm not a money-conscious person but at the same time, I can't leave in poverty so I would prefer to die at 40 and enjoy my life
What shall it profit a woman to be poor, live a long life and still lose her soul? That is double suffering. I would prefer double enjoyment

Anonymous said...

Live a jet set life, have mansions in two different countries, own a private jet, wear only designer outfits, friends with presidents, captains of industries, celebrities, have more money than you know what to do with it...and then die at age 40.

ernie said...

Life is only as good as u live it.....y live till 80 wen u r only a liability to sm1 else,if sm1 has to tk cr of u all d tym,dt aint living,nt wen u gt another option....so cut ur losses,tk all d money,live till 40,make ur mark in dis world,eat,drink,fuck,give charity,leave lagacies n die.....ITS NOT HOW LONG U LIVE BT HOW WELL U LIVE

Anonymous said...

Live a jet set life ofcourse!! Na sumtin go kill person..better live my life to da fullest..

Anonymous said...

Live large and die at 40.

Joy Nwigwe said...

nonsense qns...my papas Abraham,Isaac,Jacob,David,Paul etc never had any of this kind of life and yet they were influential for God and checked out of dis world at a ripe old age.That is where I belong,dat is my life.don't be a mediocre pls.

Anonymous said...

Live a fulfil life. The 1st is a good 1, will make impact before leaving,
1st 2 comment

Anonymous said...

40! And will make my name a Big Trademark that will always be remembered for centuries. The greatest philanthropist!

Anonymous said...

No brainer for me...It'll be #1. Largely influenced for a deep dislike of being (or feeling like) a burden on anyone. It would make me deeply unhappy for sure.
It's never about quantity it's all about quality.

Anonymous said...

i swear this question is LAME n STUPID! "Live poor till you turn 30 years old and then become paralyzed from the waist down after a tragic accident. You will depend on others to take care of you for the rest of your life...you will still live poor but the best part is; you will live to the ripe old age of 80." What's so hard to figure out in this? You're poor n you're paralyzed.. u tell me what's the point of living then?
Only a person with brain disorder will choose the second one.

Anonymous said...

Wat is life as a paralysed person? I'd prefer 2 die @ 40 knowin I lived a full life. Dying @ 80 wit poverty n sickness is tourture abeg! Its a no brainer

kingsleedan said...

None of d *above*

Anonymous said...

None

Anonymous said...

Linda Wich 1 b dis na?i prepare d 1 st o.shuoooo

psamie said...

None really matters.
I tell you,
The most important thing is that I die n go to heaven.....
40 or 80 yrs cannot be compared to eternity.

P.s
I'm Sure a lot of peeps would choose the former...
Hmmm.
Hapi fathers day by the way

Anonymous said...

I think I'll go for the first one. As far as I fulfill what God has sent me to do on earth, I think I am ok with dat. I can die and go and rest in heaven.

Anonymous said...

Without even thinking , I'd rather die at 40 than live in poverty,i have tasted poverty and no thanks I ain't going back there IJN...mm yours truly gigi

Anonymous said...

The luxury life ,would it start from 10yrs till 40yrs,if yes,I prefer the luxury life mbok...Aproko

BLOGLORD said...

God will never let me be in any of such situation

Anonymous said...

Linda is like asking, would u rather be blind or armless?

Anonymous said...

D first option.of course!!!no hesitation @ all.

local boy said...

Nawa o Linda. Even the fowl in my kitchen will answer these questions within 1 sec.
Your brain thinks sex all the time thats why its not effective anymore. It's better to establish yourself and others with your wealth and die early than live a pitiful life till you eventually die. Not our portion tho.

Anonymous said...

Dat 40 go do me ma.

Anonymous said...

Linda i no choose anyone,let Gods will be done.first to comment yeeeee.

Anonymous said...

no linda u did not compare it wel cos d way u compare d two everybody wil choose to enjoy and die at 40 i thought u wanted to say at d end suffering u go to heaven? which one is die at 80again?when u live to 80yrs misurable is nolonger life infact ur life ended at 30 so my dear next time compare well cos d choice is clear,as long as none is going to heaven 40 is a million times better than a misurable 80..

Anonymous said...

i could have both...thats what GOD told me

Anonymous said...

Well its a difficult question to answer linda

tunde nnewi said...

I beg make I stay 40 with gud heath dan stay 100 with sickness

Anonymous said...

To hell wit d age 80...I go wit d money

Anonymous said...

Non of d above! N Linda beta post my comment fa or else.....#bone face

Anonymous said...

men!this is one hard question tho.God help us,abeg i no fit choose any

Kaylee Ogunike said...

To be honest, God can't be as unfair as to present a mere human being with such tricky choices, c'mon!

Can't say I'll pick any. As much as I want to live long, I don't want to do so while suffering, makes no sense. lol

kaysdiuries.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

I reject the two of them!!!
I pray for longlife with good health amd prosperity,amen

Anonymous said...

Lindah!!!! This is tragic!! Damn!! None ooooo.

Nology Batunoni said...

WTF am i doing on earth at Age 80 while being paralysed? 40 is enof.

Anonymous said...

Ur Papa

chioma said...

Ahh linda!dis is sheer wickedneSs..not choosing any

Anonymous said...

None.

Anonymous said...

dumb question. whats so special about earth for 80yrs duh

Anonymous said...

Haaaaa, linda, thats a very serious and weird qüestion oooo, the first has good begining but Bad ending and the second with Bad begining with long life. Taaah, none will i choice will ask for option C #wink#

Anonymous said...

Stupid thoughts............only demon possesed persons have such.

sobe said...

Linda which kin one chance question be dis sef? Oya u choose one na

tracy roy said...

Hmmm biko I Prefer to die @40 ooh!!

Dame T said...

None!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Live and die wen im 40, cos no.1 i will die n my name will still linger on n my children even wen im dead will still ve a name since nigeria is all abt who is ur father, dan livg a life dat im punishment to my children 4 wat, even livg till 80 without anytyn 2 show 4 it u r a disgrace slf

Anonymous said...

Omo 40good years lo lee shey.

Anonymous said...

Abi I no go choose to die @ 40 ni.God punish long live with poverty and paralysis.

Queen Bee said...

Living well up to 40years
Then die but go to heaven.
At that u enjoyed both ways

Anonymous said...

None of d above.... With God he is able to do exceedingly above what we want or ask for and even more.so its better to ask God and u will be very comfortable and live long.

Anonymous said...

Ha, nice try! Question is though... why live 80 years of your live in pain, sorrow and poverty, when there exist an option to live half that period in plenty, good health and merriment.
If through 40 years, I guarantee that my children's great grand children will never beg for bread... who I'm I to choose 80 years of suffering...

Londoner said...

Non of the above. They said life begins @ 40. What is the point of havig money I can't live to enjoy and why should I live in poverty for the rest of my life. I can only ask for God's will to be fulfill and come to past in my life.

Georgia Iferi said...

I'd rather live 40years

Anonymous said...

Death at 40+heaven as a surety! Nothing is better!

binladdeeen said...

na wa for you linda... which one you sef go choose? rhetorical question aiye..... who like to suffer??? mssccccheeeewwww va faculo!!!

Anonymous said...

You must be stupid for this question. Duhh!!! Who wants to suffer.

Anonymous said...

the former plsss! at least i know im gon die at 40, il accomplish a few things b4 then,marry early, have just one child with an awesome man that i can rely on to take care of my seed.

gigio said...

in this our present world its nolonger how long u lived but how well u lived. what u achieved before u die keeps ur name alive even after death. in my language d say u dont do shakara with suffering. in anycase live a 40yrs life and achieve all achievables that can keep ur name alive for the next 100 yrs. than living 80 yrs paralyzed poor life. linda its me again. post my comment ooo!! or tell me how much they pay to get ones comment posted! am counting my comments u ain't posted oooo. *walks away*

Anonymous said...

Die @ 40 with a strait face

Anonymous said...

Is a very tough one,is better to live rich than to die poor,am not taken any one either

seymour said...

I'd go wiv the first. Life is not in the years you live but how well those years were n the ppl u were able to bless, the lives u touched. That's what matters in my opinion.

Aladin said...

What am I doing with a life of poverty and sickness ? That answers your question Linda

latolzy said...

I will choose d first one

mr arsenal said...

first comment, living a long life with poverty and disability is no life at all, i'll rather live a jet life.

Anonymous said...

40.....Wen yu live Τ̲̅õ̸̳͡ 80 like dat,U̶̲̥̅̊‎​​ as ðǦ☺☺ϑ as dead

mr arsenal said...

first comment, living a long life with poverty and disability is no life at all, i'll rather live a jet life.

Anonymous said...

Linda, I can say wit some certainty you picked the first. Nobody wants to live long in pains thats why some pple opt for mercy killing smtimes. Success is preferable even if it is short-lived.But poverty n paralysis for almost your life span haba.

Anonymous said...

i'd most definately go 4 d 30 years option.

Anonymous said...

None..... Did not come to this world to die at 40..........:P

Shola Scott said...

God forgive me and Dont judge me with my comment o buh yea i ll choose the first one

om_jay said...

40 yrs. Lmao

Anonymous said...

first comment, living a long life with poverty and disability is no life at all, i'll rather live a jet life.

Anonymous said...

Jeeez ds is rily hard 2 choose, u having a long life without wealth is totally a wreck!!!!!! I prefer d 1st option tho!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

40!

soms said...

=)) º°˚˚˚°ºнaĦaнaº°˚˚˚°º‎​ ......when making a choice u should ve options but I see only one option nd one tragic story so where's d second option?

kiki said...

I take 40,atleast my obit would be lived life to its fullest,to die at 80 being a burden to others,my obit would celebration of life,but because the people celebrating wouldn't be celebrating my long life but the fact they don't have to take care of me anymore in their poor state.its difficult taking care of yourself poor,talkless about taking care of someone who can't contribute.I rather live comfortably,than be an umcomfort to other even thou God favours the poor

Hosea Lewis said...

The first one of cause.

Anonymous said...

d man dat lives up to 80 with all does challenges is beta of dead... to me he is jst a walking corpse waiting for his life to be over... even if some1 dies as young as 30 sef bt makes a name for himself b4 he does he is a success.. u beta of died dan living long with nothing to show for it...success is nt bout ow long u live on earth bt ow well u live it...

Anonymous said...

Be rich and die 40!!!

mr arsenal said...

first to comment.. Living a life till the ripe old age with disability and poverty is no life at all, i'll rather live a jet life.
happy fathers day...

Anonymous said...

None. I won't pick any cos none of them is God's plan for my life.

Amber igwe said...

The first joor. That's actual living... If I'm eventually gonna die with the second,not an option.

esan abiodun said...

Taaa! I hope I never get to choose betwn these two...NONE OF THE ABOVE,, buh da 2nd one's better

Anonymous said...

I would go for the 1st,what is the need to stay up to 80yrs to suffer all that pain, when I'm not going to enjoy my stay on earth.

wale said...

Linda this na Jamb Question oh!

Anonymous said...

Neither. Thank u

Anonymous said...

The first option is better by far.

Anonymous said...

Surely na d 1st option sure pass...by a long long way sef. @olu_didit says so

modupe abolade said...

Lyk cwiozly cwioz,,none of doz optionz z fwesh!! Haba!! Wen did '8O' bcum ripe age..nd livin til 40??? Mi o fe...if u ad included 4 †ђξ former..liv til 80..nd †ђξ latter..til 120...i myt consider pikin an option..buh since †ђξ optionz aint smilin..ai don pik race o..... #legallyjaded*

Anonymous said...

Linda this ya qweshion *scratches
head* i'l gladly die rich, Sugar.

**Magic**

Anonymous said...

Linda na wah 4 u o.y ddnt u tell us 4 ur own response is.chai!!! Really weird!!! Its still pretty diana.

Anonymous said...

Nooo!!! Me I choose to live a jet set life ohh!! Den wen I die my children ad grandchildren will not suffer atall.dan been poor ad live long. Dis life is too short I no fit marry M.1

Anonymous said...

Well the most important thing is to make heaven, so I will live a jet set life so long as I work towards making heaven. I'll help d needy and change so many lives positively. I can't choose to live poor and be a burden on others. Please I wanna be a problem solver and be remembered for good, being poor won't help me achieve that!
*LINDA POST MY COMMENT O*

Anonymous said...

I will rather die at 40 than staying alive for no use

Anonymous said...

None of the above because that does not describe God's plan for me as stated in his word.

Anonymous said...

Thats actually very easy answer for me. Without a doubt, option A. Life is too short and death is inevitably anyway. I rather live a rich short life to the fullest than a miserable long life in poverty and then die at the end of all the struggling.

Alice said...

linda dat 1 is sharp..sharp d 1 of 40 @tleast i enjoy in lfy :.2nd 1 is indeed poverty !!pure 1

Anonymous said...

My sister the first part is better o as far I will get married and get kids to carry on my name shikenan living poor is enough of stress not talk of adding paralysis to it tufia!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Lol.... What a terrific question! However for me, my destination or life after death is what's most important to me. So if good life till 40 or pissant life til 80 years will take me to heaven then I choose good life till 40', lol....

Anonymous said...

First choice, I do not want to be a vegetable and poor

Anonymous said...

Linda....I wl go wt d former....wat is d essence of livn a poverty strickn lyf wen u dnt evn v a guaranty of enjoyn lyife afta death...biko lemme enjoy it nw am stl alive...
SameGirl

fikky said...

Option one is preferable coz with these evil options in the 2nd option; by the age of 32, you will have committed suicide out of frustration.

Anonymous said...

None
is my portion. I am an average struggling guy, with a good education. l
can afford all the basic things in life. l am happy with my life.

Jesuwale Israel Femi said...

Tho the time is short and enjoyable. A legacy can be created and name written on Gold-Plate. What is the benefit of living a life of misery and sickness?

I rather go early to grave and leave a MARK behind than suffer for bad 50years+30years o.

jasonex..........da king said...

The first 1 jor.....I beta live rich n die early, dan live poor and den die very late in d same poverty

Anonymous said...

What is the essence of living up to 80years and still remain poor, sad, miserable and dependent! Please die knowing you've lived your life till the fullest and in a righteous manner- even if it's a short one.

Anonymous said...

Haaa linda being poor is not an option 2 me...can't depend on pipo 2 do finz 4 me cos dey ll eventually get tayad of doin it somday..I ll chose d 1st cos I believe I ll live a life dat ll please God n put smiles on pipos face..

Anonymous said...

Gud question Linda no 1 wnts 2die at Lazarus again o me go take d 1st one. Wen am 39 nd half I giv my life 2 God die den make heaven

Mista Chris OON said...

I'd rather die @ 40...tho I'd live a Godly life so I don't miss heaven

Anonymous said...

None of the above!!!!!!

website design company in nigeria said...

To me this is a rhetorical question because i would choose the 1st option any day and at any given time. Even if i dont enjoy the money all my life my children and family would enjoy it. Sooo! Linda, i know say u choose the 1st one. Lol

Anonymous said...

Dis is Tuff oh! But Linda d suffer is too much na,no small enjoyment sef. The first is beta dan d second.

Anonymous said...

Omg,,,,what is the essence of the riches and being famous,I am sorry Linda I don't want any of the two.but I can partially go for the riches all in the name of my kids and family though...lolzzz

otunba O said...

Live the life and die at 40 is the best option,you just cant imagine the pain u will be in whn u ave no money,paralyzed and to depend on pple my sister na to live the life.

Anonymous said...

Hmmmmm lindaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

thanky civilguy said...

I will choose NONE... Without thinking for a second..

Anonymous said...

What kind of a stupid nonsense backward idiotic and negative question is this? If u wanna be rich and die young, or u wanna be a pauper and die old, that should be a personal deal with you and ur God!

Anonymous said...

Na to die at 40 jhor dan to live a life whre u cnt support urself

Anonymous said...

Abeg d first one beta

Oluyomi Odukoya said...

This question sef. Abeg, I will choose the former. Of what use is my life if I am dependent on others for more than 50 years? I will even beg for death to come sef. Having said this, the late Oyebanjo Okunuga who was JCI President died at the age of 32 years, but during his night of tribute, the way people paid glowing tributes in his honour awed me. Yes, he died young, but the impact he made, some people who lived up to 100 never made such an impact. I'll rather be a blessing to myself and others than to live a life of me, myself and I. If I amass all the wealth today, I'll remember those who don't know where the next meal would come from.

Anonymous said...

No 1 of course. This isn't even a question.

Anonymous said...

What a weird crazy question, but honestly I did like to live a short meaningful life. Dedicate my life, riches/wealth to God so that I don't only gain in this world but also in the hereafter.Will go by the 1st option!

Anonymous said...

I would have chosen the first one even if without getting paralysed at the age of 30

Cashflowpc said...

Hahahah...what is life without money? That's living dead. As long as MY life would bring smiles to the face of many, and MY name would still be remembered millenia after MY death inspiring millions. Fuck old age! Even Jesus left in his 30s, MJ left at 50 and a host of others that their names is already imprinted in the heart of humanity!

Anonymous said...

Dats a dumb ? Who will a misrable life like dat n wants to live 80years, noffin like good life.88

Anonymous said...

1st to comment. Is like choosing btw shorter years of Jesus Christ and longer years of metusala. Tony Ojukwu

Anonymous said...

Na wah oh,Linda which kind question be dis? It's complicated

Anonymous said...

1st to comment. Is like choosing btw shorter years of Jesus Christ and longer years of metusala. Tony Ojukwu

Cashflowpc said...

Hahahah...what is life without money? That's living dead. As long as MY life would bring smiles to the face of many, and MY name would still be remembered millenia after MY death inspiring millions. Fuck old age! Even Jesus left in his 30s, MJ left at 50 and a host of others that their names is already imprinted in the heart of humanity!

abi said...

Looooool , I'd rather live till 40 a rich happy man.

Anonymous said...

D very first option, livin a comfortable life. But I'll make sure I av an encounter wif God.. Straight 2 heaven! Yayyyyyyy...
Mz ebonite

Anonymous said...

4 me i prefer 2 liv large; nd log off @ 40 cox all wnt 2 get rich no bry wanna lack!

Anonymous said...

If I were to choose,then dying @40 is beta....bt one thing u should know in life is that there's a 2nd chance,if u couldn't make it,struggle for your kids tooooo,u'll surely be proud they did.

Anonymous said...

i will rather be comfortable and live long. long life and happiness is better than dying young.

zoby said...

Not like i wish to die @40 but I prefer that option cos money give life a meaning

Anonymous said...

Is better u are rich and die wen God say is ur time poverty is a disease so don't Go there

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 778   Newer› Newest»