Nigeria, Russia, China, others vote against UN resolution to protect human rights defenders | Welcome to Linda Ikeji's Blog

LI_Leaderboard_4

LI_Leaderboard_1

LI_Leaderboard_2

LI_Leaderboard_3

Thursday 26 November 2015

Nigeria, Russia, China, others vote against UN resolution to protect human rights defenders

UN General Assembly on Wednesday, November 25, adopted a resolution which seeks to protect those who face risks and attacks for their work to defend and promote human rights. 
 
The resolution includes a number of new, important and substantive provisions, including as to the vital role of advocacy and the work of human rights defenders in contributing to sustainable 
development and the realisation of economic, social and cultural rights, and as to the responsibilities of business enterprises with respect to engaging, consulting and protecting defenders.
 

Russia, China, Nigeria, Kenya,Myanmar and South Africa were among countries that voted against the resolution. Nigeria said that they saw 'no need' for the resolution, effectively denying the importance of independent civil society and dissent to democracy and development. China explained that it had ‘no choice’ but to vote against it as 'certain western countries' use the protection of defenders as an excuse to 'interfere in the internal affairs of developing countries and disrupt their social stability'.

While congratulating the 144 countries that stood with human rights defenders, International Service for Human Rights, Programme Manager and Legal Counsel. Madeleine Sinclair said they are disappointed with the 14 countries that voted against the resolution and those who declined.
     "We are extremely disappointed that 14 countries voted against the text and that a further 40 States took the cowardly position of abstaining. We agree with the Norwegian sponsors of the text who stated that both votes against the resolution and abstentions amount to a failure to recognise the important role of defenders and the need for their protection."
 
     "It is particularly disappointing to see current and incoming members of the Human Rights Council either abstaining or voting no on the resolution.The votes of South Africa and Myanmar are a complete betrayal of the many brave human rights defenders who have played such a vital role in the transitions in those States" she added.

41 comments:

Blog It With Olivia said...

Cool





















#It WiLL oNLy gEt beTTer
#iT MuSt eNd IN pRAisE

Your Original Brazilian / Peruvian hair extensions still in stock, contact 07061209332 for more info


Unknown said...

Wow!

aproko manager said...

Ghen ghen endtime vote

OSINANL said...

mtchewwwwwwww

Unknown said...

Odikwa egwu o! Linda take note!

Unknown said...

Odikwa egwu o! Linda take note!

Unknown said...

a.k.a EDWIN CHINEDU AZUBUKO said...
.
I dont care about all this, all i care about is light and light only......
.
.
***CURRENTLY IN JUPITER***

Davido's driver said...

No comment

NaijaDeltaBabe said...

Hmmmmmm

BONARIO NNAGS said...

I'm not surprised, our government never showed interest in supporting human right advocates.
From the list of the countries that voted same I'm not surprised.


~BONARIO~says so via NOKIA LUMIA

Unknown said...

Those countries don't value human rights.

Anonymous said...

HOW CAN ISLAMIC STATE VOTE TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS WE MUST BE JOKING

Anonymous said...

So Buhari can do whatever and get away with it.

Anonymous said...

Confused set of clowns called leaders.why is this up for argument or voting..do they respect human rights?no.so why the delay on whether theirs should be protect...Linda abeg post am sha

Anonymous said...

We are in trouble in Nigeria. God help us.

Unknown said...

Why would they vote against it? Na wa o

Anonymous said...

Can i imagine!

Anonymous said...

That resolution was gay inclined,it was meant to force these countries to accept same sex relationship,so you see you can't fool everybody all the time.

Anonymous said...

One of those tricks to influence countries just to legalize Homosexualism.....

ary said...

I don't get it?! Isn't that supposed to be a good thing?

knowurway.com said...

What China said was very right. I like their point.

Unknown said...

Too bad.
Is this d change?

Anonymous said...

Buhari the chronic abuser will surely vote no. The zoo will record highest human right abuse in his time

Unknown said...

Not surprised that China voted against it.

Unknown said...

This is seriously not good for our developmental plans! Imagine the ration of 14 to 144. Anyway am eating my popcorn calmly and watching.

AGB said...

Mumus here won't try to be patient and learn how world politics are played, they'd just be waiting for the slightest opportunity to support western countries and bark at their own country.

God Bless Nigeria.

Unknown said...

Aproko everytn na end time 4 u

Tefe said...

which dirty human rights defenders,the rep from China has said it all,the western nations will now use this individuals or organisation to interfere in the affairs of other nations.

Unknown said...

Wise decision for Nigeria, China and the rest 12.

Dr David Chux.O. said...

Many commenters are not aware that this is a ploy to force countries to support homosexual marriage. But thank God for China,Nigeria and Russia.

Anonymous said...

It was a trick to get countries endorse a charter that'll bind them to accepting practices alienated in certain countries such as homosexualism.

Unknown said...

I know Buhari will not say yes to that. The way they use power to humiliate people in Nigeria is bad. And money too. We need yes in that vote. But I stand with china they no the perfect reason to say no. They use such plan to enter your country and break it down like Lybia, etc

Anonymous said...

I am sure u don't even hav an idea what they are up to,I can also sense ur intelligent quote is so low that u jst vomit rubish jst 4 u to comment on this blog. Must Buhari be blamed for refusing things that he knows won't augur well wt our culture nd tradition? Must we alwys "Yes' western ideas? Since u don't even knw what that Vote entails, jst shawwaaap nd stop insulting my President. Manner less Idiata!

Unknown said...

Why are they disappointed? Because it didn't go their way?

























#TeamBlessed#

andre kelvin said...

I had to repost this comment .That resolution was gay inclined,it was meant to force these countries to accept same sex relationship,so you see you can't fool everybody all the time.

Anonymous said...

Exactly. This is Obama's smokescreen for the legalisation of all sorts of sexual immorality all over the world. Interestingly the listed are indigenous nations.

Anonymous said...

Linda! Linda!! Linda!!! How many times av I called U? Post my comments ooo, bcos I don't knw why ur appetite dey increase ontop my comment(s). Oya swallow this one join! #straightface*

Anonymous said...

All those countries above are some of the most corrupt and abusive countries in the world! Also ,countries with some of the worst ratings on the corruption perception index! Fact!!!
Are we surprised,still?

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous 7:41 pm, you are pathetic. Obviously, your suffering from endemic abuse and lack of human dignity nor respect by the Naija state has left you empty and bereft of your God-given and inalienable rights even in a democratic dispensation and enlightened world.

Anonymous said...

Just look at the 14 countries that voted NO.... 14 cowards

Anonymous said...

This is wat the USA use wen they want to destroy a whole country eg Libya Syria......this is another means to shove gay nd same sex marriage to all countries

Recent Posts