Hillary Clinton is officially the most voted losing presidential candidate in U.S history | Welcome to Linda Ikeji's Blog

LI_Mobile_Leaderboard_1

Thursday 22 December 2016

Hillary Clinton is officially the most voted losing presidential candidate in U.S history

According to all revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia on Wednesday night, Democratic party presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton is now officially the most voted presidential candidate in US election history as she surpassed President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%).
Even though Trump defeated Clinton hands down in the Electoral College votes, Clinton's 2.1% win margin is ranked third among defeated candidates in past U.S elections.

According to data from US Elections Atlas, Andrew Jackson won his election by more than 10% in 1824 while In 1876, Samuel Tilden received 3% more votes than Rutherford B. Hayes.
at 12/22/2016 12:30:00 pm

13 comments:

  1. Unknown22 December 2016 at 12:36

    GAZE WEEPING WAILERS!the most voted losing presidential candidate in U.S history huh? FREEBORN LAUGH AND LAUGH TO KILLARY SUPPORTERS SHAME. she don lose be say she don lose unless una get second type of president then una should give it to her. PLEASE SHE DID NOT LOSE BUT WON IN LINDA IKEJI BLOG,T B JOSHUA CHURCH. MUSLIMS AND HAUSA PLACE.
    freeborn hiss. Who second hand help huh?

























    #sad indeed

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:21

    Such a history maker!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:22

    She should add it to her CV. Linda take note!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:23

    trump is their president like him or hate him

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:25

    Good one

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:30

    The election was never about number of votes.. It's like saying u won a soccer game bcuz u had d most ball possession.. What matters is the points

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unknown22 December 2016 at 13:44

    Bitch pls.
    Jst let it go.

    ReplyDelete
  8. F822 December 2016 at 13:56

    Case close now abi?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous22 December 2016 at 14:35

    thank u @ rarespecie. seriously linda, just let it go already. haba!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous22 December 2016 at 19:08

    Please lend yourself a brain, Linda. She won by 4.2 in California and 1.6 million in New York alone. Take out Calfiornia for instance and she would have lost the popular cite by 1.2 million. This largely populated states alone CANNOT determine who wins the presidential election. This is why the electoral is needed to even the playing field and allow fair representation across board.

    Now, take that as an education and get over the loss, loser!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous22 December 2016 at 19:09

    Please lend yourself a brain, Linda. She won by 4.2 in California and 1.6 million in New York alone. Take out Calfiornia for instance and she would have lost the popular cite by 1.2 million. This largely populated states alone CANNOT determine who wins the presidential election. This is why the electoral is needed to even the playing field and allow fair representation across board.

    Now, take that as an education and get over the loss, loser!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Unknown22 December 2016 at 19:22

    LOL
    -D great anonymous now as Vivian Reginalds

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous23 December 2016 at 18:27

    You still don't get it Madam Linda; Trump was not supposed to be in the reckoning in the first place, he was supposed to suffer the most embarrassing loss in history, instead, Clinton lost to him

    ReplyDelete

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the views of Linda Ikeji.

Recent Posts