Laura, from North Carolina resigned from her job as a teacher at the Cumberland International Early College after reports of her alleged lesbian behaviour emerged in December. She was arrested yesterday Feb. 8th after the teenage girl eventually went to the police and confessed to the consensual relationship.
The teacher has now been charged with four counts of taking indecent liberties and two counts of sexual offence with a student. She has also been banned from having any contact with children under the age of 18 including her two sons and a daughter.
When Laura was informed about the ban in court, she became very emotional and asked the judge:
"Not even my own children?".The presiding judge, Judge Cheri-Siler-Mack responded:
"You will not be around any child under age 18."The alleged sexual relationship between the teacher and student was consensual, however, the teacher is charged under their state laws that ban sex between a teacher and their student.
What can conji hold am?
ReplyDelete.her wahala!
Delete#XENO-FABIAN
See wahala...
DeleteLOL let her be abeg
ReplyDeleteFrom seeing her own children? That's harsh!
DeleteHmmmmmmmmn
ReplyDeletePEPSI ADDICT
Wetin we nogo hear?
DeleteWetin we nogo hear?
Deletetoo harsh why can't she see her own kids #still that Imo boy
DeleteOyinbo with their wahala
ReplyDeleteAsin
DeleteLike the lil girl was enjoying the whole parol
Omo 17yrs wey don get sense
Not fair jor
Hmmmmmm
ReplyDeleteOtu ocha. Why na.
ReplyDeleteIf I am president,all homos and lesbians will serve 25 years imprisonment. One homo and one lesbian will share one cell. Necessity is the mother of invention. When conji catch them,their brains will start working normally and the disease of gayness will be cured.
ReplyDeleteHahahha
DeleteHahahahahahahaaha....asin eh
DeleteSome Genius.
DeleteLets patent this idea n trade something.
Hhahahahahahahahhha ur are d best I will vote for u so dat u can pass d bill. Lmao
DeleteEnd time promo!
ReplyDeleteEnter your comment... Serious one
ReplyDeleteNawa oo.. Very bad
ReplyDeleteEnugu's second shoe designer
And she's even married. So here husband cucumber nor sweet her, Na woman own she want??
ReplyDeleteLINDA'S HOUSEGIRL
Hypocrisy! But you allow same-sex marriages.
ReplyDeleteend time ppl
ReplyDeleteImagine...consensual ke
ReplyDeleteAm so sure she is being deprived by her husband sexually and emotionally. Or perhaps he doesn't know how to touch the right places in her body
ReplyDeleteEnd time things...
ReplyDeleteBan from her own children?
ReplyDeleteNot so fair!
Can lead to depression n suicide.
Ban from her own children?
ReplyDeleteNot so fair!
Can lead to depression n suicide.
This woman shaaaa
ReplyDelete~make I go drink one bottle of beer~
Ewww she couldn't find someone else but a student ? If Na naija now I for say she don use d girl do ritual but then
ReplyDeleteNot fair
ReplyDeleteHow old are her children? Pretty absurd to punish the children so harshly, as for the court to strip the mother away. 17 is old enough that we're not talking forceful abuse of trust, one presumes. Court has no business forcing children into foster care, or forcing a divorce situation, when two consenting adults get together. Arguments persist that age of consent should be 16 or 17, at at the very least, penalties should be tiered and staged based on age. The judges sentence would have made sense for a much younger person, but not for a 17 year old. So ruin the lives of 3 young young people, to teach a 30 year old a lesson about how she needed to wait that whole single year (18) before engaging with that younger 'victim'? I call BS, and the penalty seems incredibly inexcusably harsher than the crime. Heck, half of you will turn around and search for such a sexualized encounter on youtube, and you'll probably find it. Mother daughter, teacher student, etc. Don't be naive and allow the state to overstep it's boundaries. State has no business enforcing zero tolerance in this scenario, and denying a woman the right to her own children, especially considering the woman never hurt, abducted, robbed, etc, anyone. Those children need a mother. Will the state and this judge take it upon themselves to replace her? How will her kids and husband feel about the new surrogate replacement state nanny? Give me a break with this fluff story. Judge should be embarrassed to have meddled in such a way. I doubt the 17 year old 'victim' will be scarred for life or deal with very much disruption at all. Got it bad, got it bad, got it bad, I'm hot for teacher. So bad, so bad, I'm hot for teacher. Judges decision to restrain the older laides rights to see her own children should be reversed, and shame on the judge for behaving so harshly where the punishment clearly exceeded the crime.
ReplyDeleteOmoh ur comment long nor be small
DeleteNonsense
ReplyDeleteNa wa oooooo
ReplyDeleteWhy her children naa. Ofcourse she won't sleep with them naa
ReplyDeleteSo she had an affair that was consensual with a student how does that affect her seeing her children that ruling is wrong abegg in as much as she had an affair it has been said by d partaker it was consensual
ReplyDeleteHmm.
ReplyDeleteServes her right!
#FINEST
#Did you guys miss me?
Jesus is Lord!
ReplyDeleteHer cup of fried kpekere
ReplyDelete