When I saw the first pic, I was so confused, but that's the baby's feet sticking out from under the blanket. In the second, the man seems to have some long arms though he really doesn't!
Linda, your the one that always want to see something morally obscene in every pics even when its not there . Like in this pics, its just the baby legs showing under the mother skin
Hummmmmmm......Linda, I don't know what u mean by corrupt minded people o. What does that baby's legs look like under 'there'? For the second pix, quite tricky.
Lmao
ReplyDeleteHahahaha... For a moment I thought it a Penis and Brokos.. Not until I looked very closely. Linda u got me on this..😀😀😀
DeleteLmao at what? Dry ass post!
DeleteLolzzzzzzzzzzzz. Linda, I almost screamed until I saw d second pic.
DeleteDis is really photoshop@work. Nice one frm u Linda and so sweet of u!
Llmao...n d oda looks lik d man stretched his hand
DeleteAbsolutely notin
DeleteI see the baby's legs. Linda take note!
ReplyDeleteI see the baby's legs. Linda take note!
ReplyDeleteI see the baby's legs. Linda take note!
ReplyDeleteHahahahaha I actually fell for the trick! It's d baby's legs not a not what we tot initially
ReplyDeleteIt's cold it's cold all is cold
And the woman's hand turned out to be like d man's hand. Nice
DeleteHmmmmmmmm am not here ooo....lolz
ReplyDeleteTricky
ReplyDeleteI saw a dick! Transgender?
ReplyDeleteA baby feet
ReplyDeleteNaughty minds....the first photo is kinda corrupting though but it's d lil boy's leg..
ReplyDeleteHehehehe
ReplyDeleteBaby legs is all I see.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a dick,lol but its not,its the babys leg,we aint stupid linda lol!
ReplyDeleteWhen I saw the first pic, I was so confused, but that's the baby's feet sticking out from under the blanket. In the second, the man seems to have some long arms though he really doesn't!
ReplyDeleteDats d baby's legs...looks funny doh...Linda ur mind is corrupt......lol
ReplyDeleteYea, some illusions. But the 1st one scarry shaa, if u think the baby's leg na the lady 'SHOW', me I go take off oo if I c SHOW like that.
ReplyDeleteNot exactly what most people are thinking! It is the baby's feet. 2nd photo is the other lady hands wrapped around her friend the white lady.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely nothing! This is a mother carrying her baby on her Tommy for the chiLd to sleep well.
ReplyDeleteSmh
ReplyDeleteThat'd be one shriveled disgusting dick anyway.
Magicblackxxl@gmail.com
Lol@ the first pic. It's the baby's tiny lovely legs.
ReplyDelete@ second pic it's actually the ladies hand that looked like the extended hand of the man behind
At first I thought a tranny but on a closer look I realized it was the lil baby's legs lol
ReplyDeleteI see baby's foot.
ReplyDeleteHahahahahahahahahahaha…For a second i thought i saw amu lol.
ReplyDeleteLol
ReplyDeleteFunny,
ReplyDeleteI see nothing.
ReplyDeleteI see baby's foot!
ReplyDeleteHahahaha!all i see is a small thin thing,linda ikeji best friend.
ReplyDeleteWho is currpter than you miss linda.you are the one that corrupted me here.
#sad indeed
what is that moron guy over there looking at speechless,he must be from ibo decendant.
#sad indeed
#sad indeed
Linda, your the one that always want to see something morally obscene in every pics even when its not there . Like in this pics, its just the baby legs showing under the mother skin
ReplyDeleteHahahaha!all i see is a small thin thing,linda ikeji best friend.
ReplyDeleteWho is currpter than you miss linda.you are the one that corrupted me here.
#sad indeed
what is that moron guy over there looking at speechless,he must be from ibo decendant.
#sad indeed
#sad indeed
Lol 😁. Linda na ur mind corrupt pass
ReplyDeleteHummmmmmm......Linda, I don't know what u mean by corrupt minded people o. What does that baby's legs look like under 'there'? For the second pix, quite tricky.
ReplyDelete#TeamBlessed#
Lmao! I swear I thought it's a tranny!!
ReplyDeleteDon't know ooo
ReplyDeleteLinda if u wan show d tin,show am nahh..no dey tukoo Mmadu akpili
ReplyDeleteHmmmmmmmmm lida your mind is really corrupt all I can see is innocent picture taking out of contempt.
ReplyDeleteIts the baby's legs. Naughty you.
ReplyDeleteNICE 1
ReplyDeleteLinda! Those are the toddler's feet
ReplyDeleteLinda ur mind Don rotten. Tufiakwa.
ReplyDeleteNope
ReplyDeleteDirty minded pple... dee
ReplyDeleteHmmm, na de baby's leg nah. Kai linda u too like ihe iberebe eehh.
ReplyDeleteThe baby's legs... nd the guys arms
ReplyDeleteVery funny
ReplyDeleteNothing.
ReplyDelete*Miss official
This Linda sef @corrupt minded people#
ReplyDeleteNo be u dey spoil us?
Na u be our mama 4 all these bad bad things.
I see nathing Linda oooo
ReplyDeletelol but that her baby's leg, all this without Christ is hell, Linda take note
ReplyDeleteNothing is cool
ReplyDeleteLol, very funny people
ReplyDeleteLol
ReplyDeleteLinda you no be am o...
ReplyDeletechoices of mind set
ReplyDeletefirst photo... Is the legs of the baby not penis
ReplyDeleteAnd the second picture..... The man folded his arm and not toucjing the lady.
Lolzzzzzzzzzzzz. Linda, I almost scream unntil I saw d second pic. Dis is really photoshop@work. Nice one frm u Linda!
ReplyDeleteDumb Fuck.
DeleteGrow some Brain.
both ar jus legs stretch out hahaha! nothin more!
ReplyDeleteboth ar jus legs stretch out hahaha! nothin more!
ReplyDeletelols linda u too corrupt
ReplyDeleteU know and u are asking. U tell us what's wrong na
ReplyDeleteThe child's leg n d woman's hand... d man behind is folding his arms
ReplyDeleteThat's the baby's feet in the first photo and the man behind in the second photo has his arms folded, the hand on the ladies shoulder ain't his. Lol
ReplyDeleteNothing all I see is baby little leg but looks like d**k lol
ReplyDeleteThat's not a dick but the babies feet in the first photo, and the hand on the that lady's shoulder is not that man's, his arms are folded. lol
ReplyDeletesorry whts tricky about d second one?
ReplyDeleteThat is Caitlyn
ReplyDeleteThe baby's feet & that's obviously the lady's hand not d guy lol
ReplyDeleteHehe I wuld say shemale Bt nah baby leg
ReplyDeleteLinda you got me
ReplyDeleteLol, the second pix, looks lyk d man's hand is on her shoulder but it's not..
ReplyDeletenothing is wrong in the pics, that thing there is the foots of the baby...linda, u too spoil, tufia.
ReplyDeleteDidn't get the joke in the 2nd pic though
ReplyDeleteThe Baby's legs,corrupt minded Linda
ReplyDeleteLinda that's too big to be a woman's p**sy, abi ur own big like that...that's the baby's feet.
ReplyDeleteWhen I initially saw the first picture , I tot it was Caitlyn Jenner babysitting North West lol until I zoomed in and saw it was the baby's legs lol
ReplyDelete*Linda's Future Hubby*
Nonsense. He turn to she dt d result
ReplyDeleteThe baby's leg
ReplyDeleteBABYS FEET NOT COC****
ReplyDeleteLADIES HAND NOT MANS HAND
Laffs, baby's feet
ReplyDeleteLol @ dirty minded
ReplyDeleteSmiles
ReplyDeletePeople sef, all there is to see without prejudice is the Baby's legs, some are saying little boy how do you know the sex of the baby
ReplyDeleteLol,baby's legs n d oda pix seems like d man behind d couple has elongated hand.lol very tricky
ReplyDeleteLin Lin,your mind dirty sha @1st pic
ReplyDelete@Richmond IchematiAugust 8, 2015 at 11:21 AM,did you serve @Ogun state?
...NA ZO
I saw d legs but my problem is d position of the baby at the central spot. But more confusing, the appearance of the lady, she seems to be unclothed.
ReplyDeleteDirty minded people
ReplyDeleteDirty minded people
ReplyDelete