The UKAD report dates back to urine samples taken in February 2015 but released in June 2016 which showed traces of banned substance nandrolone — nine months before Tyson Fury’s title win over Wladmir Klitschko. Fury's lawyers are asking why it took over a year for urine sample results to be released given that a second test showed no traces of the anabolic steroid and that a blood test at the time was also negative.
According to the court documents, Tyson's took test for the last ten months before his fight with Klitschko which also came back negative and he was told by the UKAD that he won't be charged or prosecuted . Fury also claims they were told by UKAD that the contamination of a dietary supplement was the most likely explanation of the positive result.
Fury’s big rematch against Klitschko is scheduled for October 29.
Source : Sun UK


Serves them right!
ReplyDeleteOoopppsssss.....Now he can sue
ReplyDeleteMoye says so via BB Passport courtesy LIB
Jzzzz.. ugly paunch....
ReplyDeleteServes them right
ReplyDeleteBadt guy tyson.
ReplyDeleteSigned
LibBadBoy
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
ReplyDeleteOh well...
ReplyDelete...merited happiness
Dats his business, if he wants to sue dem he should go ahead n clear his name of being a cheat.
ReplyDeleteDats his business, if he wants to sue dem he should go ahead n clear his name of being a cheat.
ReplyDeleteThis guy doesn't look like boxer.
ReplyDeleteYour comment will be visible after approval.
GOOD TO SEE
ReplyDeleteAUNTY LINDA 👩
Okk
ReplyDeleteThat means the UK anti doping organization cup don full be that. Tuface, Wizkid, Olamide Are Original Musicians But Timi Dakolo Is Not - Majek Fashek
ReplyDeleteNa their way! Linda take note!
ReplyDeleteSeen
ReplyDeleteSeen
ReplyDeleteOK
ReplyDelete