Spot the difference featuring Justin Bieber | Welcome to Linda Ikeji's Blog

LI_Mobile_Leaderboard_1

Saturday 10 January 2015

Spot the difference featuring Justin Bieber

Photoshopped vs original...see any difference?

178 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. They are both photoshopoed
      The one on the right was simply a Diss
      Look at how tiny his leg was

      Delete
  2. Big prick,Small prick

    ReplyDelete
  3. Linda pay before service. Wen u re ready I'll send you my account number.




    @Sophia Stephen

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1.pampers midi
    2.pampers maxi

    ReplyDelete
  5. The crotch area is a whole lot smaller in one!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Leave my justin alone linda.....Amibi

    ReplyDelete
  7. One DICK is bigger than the other

    ReplyDelete
  8. His biscuit is bigger in d photoshopped pix. Linda take note!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Original is better than photocopy.




    @Sophia Stephen

    ReplyDelete
  10. His DICK is bigger in one than the other, diff write ups.
    $.
    $.
    @Mr Endowed via Lumia phone

    ReplyDelete
  11. Enough of all dis, people need money, stop telling us to spot the difference, it doesn't make sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then leave commenting for pple interested....If Ur so broke..go n beg

      Delete
    2. Then leave commenting for pple interested....If Ur so broke..go n beg

      Delete
  12. The first one is photoshoped.

    ReplyDelete
  13. D six packs A̶̲̥̅₪D̶̲̥̅ dat 'tin' in his boxers

    ReplyDelete
  14. just passing by i choose not to comment

    ReplyDelete
  15. >>>> Every part of his body is the difference, no point spotting. <<<<

    ReplyDelete
  16. In the first pix he is well built,but looks emaciated in the second pix.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The diferences are so cystal clear cnt start listing all though but let me say one or two they added more muscles, breast ,packs. They added hair on his down stomach and dey increased his waist line his whatever was padded his back also wasphotoshopped and so on

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hahahahahahahaha they increased the bulge in his groins, more like tripled it or quadrupled it

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lmao!!! this is so funny. the difference is quite obvious.


    B.E.S.T

    ReplyDelete
  20. linda why you the look at the size of justin cup and his under pants

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes now d 6packs no reach, and d original Justin Bieber down is still under construction

    ReplyDelete
  22. Lol lol too many difference joor.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Even increased the bulge on his chest, on a different note, this bro aint look good anymore, does he have a hunch back now?

    ReplyDelete
  24. lol, they just dash the guy bigger "everything", enhanced abs, muscles and even d**k. Photoshop is a bitch sha.

    Please click on my name for Fashion/Fitness/Beauty tips

    ReplyDelete
  25. Haba Linda!!! You too like bad things. The prick for the left side big past the right side. And also the write-ups on the pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The real justin with his little tiny 'P' and the photoshop justin with massive oversized 'P'
    ¤
    ¤¤¤GUTS OVER FEAR¤¤¤
    ¤
    ¤¤¤QUEENMAYA¤¤¤

    ReplyDelete
  27. He looks bigger in d Calvin klein pic especially his Dick nd ass. Lol Sure d pic is more recent to d other one

    ReplyDelete
  28. He looks bigger in d Calvin klein pic especially his Dick nd ass. Lol Sure d pic is more recent to d other one

    ReplyDelete
  29. His junior and muscle is bigger in the 1st pic than the second pic lol #onelovefromsnow#

    ReplyDelete
  30. Everything increased...even his cheat nd arms

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bigger body and bulge of course lol

    ReplyDelete
  32. The change in write ups in the picture n small......vs big.....stuff

    ReplyDelete
  33. He looks huge in d Photoshop pix dan d original

    ReplyDelete
  34. The change in write ups in the picture n small......vs big.....stuff

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yeepaaa....deception everywhere!

    ReplyDelete
  36. seen much diff 4rm top 2 bottom.....#koeasy

    ReplyDelete
  37. Lili,

    D ads is not on d 2nd pix while d other difference is d size dick reduced in d 2nd pix.

    Hope am rite?

    But I must confess, d tatoo's on his body God is against it and it a cause unto anyone dat do it accordingly to d bible.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Lol everything is different..the difference is too clear..

    ReplyDelete
  39. Lol everything is different..the difference is too clear..

    ReplyDelete
  40. Dey jus dash d boy xtra evertin, lol. @chidinma

    ReplyDelete
  41. MtcheeW. Everything is smaller in the original. I'm not surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Plenty differences ... Justin bieber no get big cock joor .. haba.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The koko was not as big as we thought. Lol


    Order for your beautiful bedspread 79AEFD3B. Delivery available Nationwide.

    ReplyDelete
  44. He posted a video of the #mycalvins on his instagram... The right pic is fake... He looks lik d pic for real

    ReplyDelete
  45. "Any difference "?.... Hiia, Linda.....is dat a rhetorical question?..... buh, sha...thank God for photo shop oh....

    ReplyDelete
  46. Lolxxxxx!!!!..... Linda!!!?? I mo say na his d*** u go first reduce... Itz gud2like em big sha, Datz y u fink BIG!!!
    We are similar in dat aspect*winks

    ReplyDelete
  47. He looks smaller in tнє original pic esp his ding dong â„“oâ„“z, I wonder how a̶̲̥̅̊ white kid could ve all D̶̲̥̅̊α̲̅† down there Photoshop!!!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Busted!!! Lmao see his small somfin

    ReplyDelete
  49. Both rubbish but there is big difference. They need to an photoshopping as it is deceitful.

    ReplyDelete
  50. U'v already told us d difference. "Photoshopped vs original" and d names written on d pix

    ReplyDelete
  51. The supposed un-photoshoped pic is actually photoshoped look at the leg from wher the length of d brief stopped u wld see dat d pic roo was photoshoped......american media wld jus do anything to create a stir...

    ReplyDelete
  52. Not much difference its just the Calvin Klein advert and of course his d**k pop out in one than the other

    #thats all I see

    ReplyDelete
  53. Beta photoshoppin....

    ReplyDelete
  54. D difference is clear

    ReplyDelete
  55. They just increased his abs abeg

    ReplyDelete
  56. In d original,d dick is bigger and his muscles too.

    ReplyDelete
  57. They made him look grabber. Arms, chest, back nd even down there.

    ReplyDelete
  58. The difference is clear imagine d original junior nd d fotoshop junior

    ReplyDelete
  59. PLEASE WHAT IS WITH ALL THESE SPOT THE DIFFERENCE STUFF WITH ALL THE CELEBRITIES. I NEED TO KNOW PLEASE

    ReplyDelete
  60. Na wa o...see photoshopping...y must dey photoshop bulge...hian

    ReplyDelete
  61. Big prick,extra packs and muscles on the Photoshoped and they even add hair for him 2 lol

    ReplyDelete
  62. Photoshop=bulge... original=no bulge

    ReplyDelete
  63. Hmmmm even Bieber loves an extra gluteal muscle

    ReplyDelete
  64. Linda, na this guy prick you still dey dwell on?

    ReplyDelete
  65. He looks bigger in the first one

    ReplyDelete
  66. The difference is sooo much,lolzzz

    ReplyDelete
  67. Photoshop or nt! Persn wey fyn dn fyn sha! Justin is becomin soo hawt!...says Millions

    ReplyDelete
  68. The difference is very clear lolzzz

    ReplyDelete
  69. Lol.. the bulge

    ReplyDelete
  70. Longer neck, bigger chest, broader shoulder and bigger dick

    # I know who I am #

    ReplyDelete
  71. his dick is bigger in d Photoshop likewise is chest

    ReplyDelete
  72. Lol they made everything big.

    ReplyDelete
  73. whatelse if not the bulge size.
    Linda and tininy talala

    ReplyDelete
  74. EWO! Thy photoshoped his "idodo' Linda you baaatd lol


    #GodblessNigeria

    ReplyDelete
  75. Loool I knew it was too good to be true

    ReplyDelete
  76. Awwwww... I love me some photoshopped Justin..
    smoking hot!


    .....A better Nigeria I pray....

    ReplyDelete
  77. Bulged dick...Apparently Beiber ain't so endowed.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Awwwww... I love me some photoshopped Justin..
    smoking hot!


    .....A better Nigeria I pray....

    ReplyDelete
  79. Awwwww... I love me some photoshopped Justin..
    smoking hot!


    .....A better Nigeria I pray....

    ReplyDelete
  80. Awwwww... I love me some photoshopped Justin..
    smoking hot!


    .....A better Nigeria I pray....

    ReplyDelete
  81. Diff is glaring jor, u dn't have to look too hard

    ReplyDelete
  82. The 'koko'

    ReplyDelete
  83. The first is photo shop while the 2nd is the original,good for him
    s.imoh@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  84. The first is photo shop while the 2nd is the original,good for him
    s.imoh@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  85. The first is photo shop while the 2nd is the original,good for him
    s.imoh@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  86. The first is photo shop while the 2nd is the original,good for him
    s.imoh@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  87. the bulge is much on the photo shopped

    ReplyDelete
  88. The first picture is bulky bulky but the other one is slimmer .
    COOLEST BABE

    ReplyDelete
  89. Me sef no say Justin no fit gather all dose things, I had a feeling that something was done somewhere

    ReplyDelete
  90. lolz... Linda..... Linda... I saw it oh

    ReplyDelete
  91. D 'u know' is smaller in d duplicate.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Lol! Linda na Wettin u sabi pass b dat!

    ReplyDelete
  93. The difference is crystal clear..

    ReplyDelete
  94. Both pictures look photoshopped, one over-photoshopped, the other under-photoshopped

    ReplyDelete
  95. One is Clare than the other

    ReplyDelete
  96. Dem increase the kini
    BT Justin bibier it is nt abt Hw big the kini is dts Hw u perform o
    Ask my Nigerian brothers?
    Lmao

    ReplyDelete
  97. MR EDDY said.
    The difference is the photoshop very the original.
    ^
    ^
    ^™THAT EDO BOY.COM~wishes u happy new year.

    ReplyDelete
  98. PEOPLE though why lie abt ur bum ur thing there kilode.. chai

    ReplyDelete
  99. They really buffed him up....lol

    ReplyDelete
  100. Sure i can see it you Linda with this thing you are obssesed with sha.

    ReplyDelete
  101. The underwear has a different colour at the right-inner tigh and the penis has been "altered"

    ReplyDelete
  102. Hahaha d Calvin Klein one with all d photoshop really fooled me... he looks like a scrawny cat in the original one.. oh well, enuf eye candy for one day... well don Ck, una graphic artist try well..

    ReplyDelete
  103. choiii...linda ooo

    ReplyDelete
  104. I for say oo....hu dash obele justin all dat body

    ReplyDelete
  105. Plenty difference. Photo shopped looks matured than the real one. Ehen I thought as much when I first saw the CK endorsement.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Thought as much.
    When I saw that pics,I know something is wrong some where...Yes o,difference dey wella

    ReplyDelete
  107. Dear Linda,really I think u should.there is no sentiment in business.cmon its ads.if tv stations were to also refuse getting involved with politics,how do we know about the people we want to vote for.the ads and jingles all add to the election fever, if it is possible,you run ads for the two political parties fine.dat way pple know that u are not supporting any one party.u are just doin ur job. But remember me when d soup done o.

    ReplyDelete
  108. So all the muscle, arse and junk reduced in d second pix.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lool... D difference is as wild as snoop dogy wife's pussy

      Delete
  109. The d ...one is bigger than the other ...lol and also it ain't clavin klein on the other

    ReplyDelete
  110. Enough difference,i for wonder

    ReplyDelete
  111. E be like say them true true photoshop JB blockos oh! Onyx Godwin's legs are even thicker than it.

    ReplyDelete
  112. I know you will notice the difference Linda. Ofcos it's the bulge one is airbrushed or photoshoped and the other is real

    ReplyDelete
  113. Lolz! Make believe... u go fear

    ReplyDelete
  114. The pack,the chest and the ding-dong...lol

    ReplyDelete
  115. And my gf was screaming arrrgh justin few days ago

    ReplyDelete
  116. Many difference dey wey I nor fit list.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Smaller or no pen*s in d second pic.

    ReplyDelete
  118. 1. Rat penis
    2. Lean biceps
    3. Flat yansh
    Photoshop sweet o

    ReplyDelete
  119. Him tingy looks small in d other pix.

    ReplyDelete
  120. yes...a lot of photoshopping done-biceps, chest, crotch...

    ReplyDelete
  121. Linda is d baddest gal. Chai!.

    ReplyDelete
  122. magnified chest n d***

    ReplyDelete
  123. Alas, he doesn't possess the pack Linda thought he did!

    ReplyDelete
  124. I knew his crunch must have been edited

    ReplyDelete
  125. The guy no grab for original plus him "piccolo" appears smaller for original.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Photoshoped;- looks like a matured guy,obvious bulge,cool abs. Original;- all opposite of photoshop.. the Lil boy we know

    ReplyDelete
  127. D major difference is d size of d bulge

    ReplyDelete
  128. Linda I no dey spot anytin again

    ReplyDelete
  129. linda u too see

    ReplyDelete
  130. Lol. They dashed him muscle and some extra junk in his trunk. His face still remains cute sha.

    ReplyDelete
  131. increased butt and chest..they both look original

    ReplyDelete
  132. Hehehe ehehehe hehehe

    duchessofnothin@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  133. Linda no do o, u hear me so. Linda take note!

    ReplyDelete
  134. Small ass nd small penis nd he looks bigger in d ck pic

    ReplyDelete
  135. No. He looks the same. That na question??? Elephant and ant na the same? Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  136. the one on the left is actually the real one oo...the thinner one is the edited.....facebook...osibodu adeolu

    ReplyDelete
  137. The difference is very obvious. Did you at first believe that Justin of yesterday could have developed that big a package in the photoshopped pix?

    ReplyDelete
  138. pls do, it's pure buiz

    ReplyDelete
  139. buffer in one slimmer in one

    ReplyDelete
  140. Lmao... Lonad eh.. Okay, na with and without the pad for front

    ReplyDelete

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the views of Linda Ikeji.

Recent Posts