Wikipedia has barred citations of The Daily Mail after
editors of the online encyclopedia concluded on February 8, 2017 that
the British tabloid is "generally unreliable."
The
decision came after years of long debate over the Daily Mail's
credibility among Wikipedia's active community of volunteer editors. The
editors explained that the decision stemmed from "the Daily Mail's
reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out
fabrication."
As a result,
the Daily Mail and its online offshoot have been "generally prohibited"
as a reference on Wikipedia, "especially when other more reliable
sources exist."
The
editors recommended installing an "edit filter" that will "warn editors
attempting to use the Daily Mail as a reference." They also encouraged
the volunteers to review the thousands of Daily Mail citations already
on Wikipedia, and to "remove/replace them as appropriate."
The
Daily Mail is one of the UK's most commercially successful tabloids,
and its website churning out upwards of 1,600 stories a day is the
most-read online newspaper in the world.
But
the publication has at times been as wildly inaccurate as it is widely
read. In 2014, George Clooney ripped the Daily Mail for a story claiming
that the mother of Clooney's then-fiancee, Amal Alamuddin, opposed
their marriage for religious reasons. The story, littered with false
claims, was eventually deleted.
Earlier
this week, a lawyer for First Lady Melania Trump re-filed a lawsuit
against the Daily Mail over an already-retracted story detailing claims
that she used to be involved in a "high-end escort" service.
Source CNN
Lol want a wawuu. Not good for DailyMail's reputation.
ReplyDelete. ~BONARIO~says so via NOKIA LUMIA
And this is where you get half of your blog posts from.
ReplyDeleteNA WAOH
ReplyDeleteYou hear Linda..That is where you quote most of your post including media takeout ..the most unreliable sources
ReplyDeletehmm
ReplyDelete-D great anonymous now as Vivian Reginalds
right from time they write with extreme exaggerations and unconfirmed statements. But many people do not believe
ReplyDelete