Oscar overhauls membership, voting rules to promote diversity | Welcome to Linda Ikeji's Blog

LI_Mobile_Leaderboard_1

Saturday, 23 January 2016

Oscar overhauls membership, voting rules to promote diversity

The film academy is pledging to double the number of female and minority members by 2020, and will immediately diversify its leadership by adding three new seats to its board of governors. Academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs announced the changes on Friday, following a weeklong storm of criticism and calls for an Oscar boycott after academy members nominated an all-white slate of actors for the second year in a row.

'The Academy is going to lead and not wait for the industry to catch up,' she said in a statement. 
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' 51-member board of governors unanimously approved a series of reforms late Thursday to 'begin the process of significantly changing our membership composition,' Isaacs said. 
The number of minorities currently serving as members of the academy has not been revealed. 
“These new measures regarding governance and voting will have an immediate impact and begin the process of significantly changing our membership composition.”
Beginning later this year, each new member’s voting status will last 10 years, and will be renewed if that new member has been active in motion pictures during that decade.  In addition, members will receive lifetime voting rights after three ten-year terms; or if they have won or been nominated for an Academy Award.  We will apply these same standards retroactively to current members.  In other words, if a current member has not been active in the last 10 years they can still qualify by meeting the other criteria.  Those who do not qualify for active status will be moved to emeritus status.  Emeritus members do not pay dues but enjoy all the privileges of membership, except voting.  This will not affect voting for this year’s Oscars.
At the same time, the Academy will supplement the traditional process in which current members sponsor new members by launching an ambitious, global campaign to identify and recruit qualified new members who represent greater diversity.
The decision was made at an emergency board meeting Thursday night. Academy honchos, including president Cheryl Boone Isaacs and CEO Dawn Hudson, opted not to wait for the regularly scheduled board meeting on Jan. 26. The changes were announced Friday morning.
Also on Thursday, sources said the Academy met with ABC officials and reps of Chris Rock, confirming that he will host the Feb. 28 ceremony. Jada Pinkett Smith, Spike Lee and Will Smith said they will not attend. Some other activists had urged Rock to withdraw; he never addressed those directly, but insiders said he believes he can do more good by remaining, since the Academy Awards reach a worldwide audience.
After worldwide media criticism over the Jan. 14 Oscar nominations, Academy officials knew they had to make some bold moves, and make them quickly. The image of the Oscars and the Academy were tarnished when the all-Caucasian lineup of 20 actors immediately led to bigger questions about the lack of diversity within the Academy — and ultimately within the industry.
The Academy has 17 branches; actors nominate actors, editors nominate editors, and so on; the entire eligible membership votes on final Oscars.
Four days after the Jan. 14 announcement of nominations, Boone Isaacs issued a statement saying there would be “dramatic steps to alter the makeup of our membership.” She did not give details at the time.

30 comments:

  1. I chooutas not! Linda take note!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok. More Instagram followers for the academy

      Delete
  2. Hmm.. OK oo










    Enugu's second shoe designer

    ReplyDelete
  3. So they were waiting for the boycott. #IRepLIB

    ReplyDelete
  4. Y You nd see why protest is good sometimes. If they had kept quiet it will seem normal but it is not. People are always responsible for their act because they know what they are doing. Speak up people don't just keep quiet.



    Bliss n blossom 2016

    ReplyDelete
  5. And some fools said Jada was. Stupid now who is laffing last. Jada just brought down holly wood damn d power of a beautiful black strong woman she was persistent and d husband backed her. I hope our young girls will earn a thing or two about preparing ones self for the future instead of dating married men and posting their pictures on social media calling sombodys husband Bae thunder fire una al u will ever b is a side chic(ken).congrats to jada and will they just fought a battle

    ReplyDelete
  6. Does it change that fact that only whites were nominated?.... No it doesn't!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some good news for the actors







    #*karlishah*

    ReplyDelete
  8. She should give detail please






















































































    !brightosman aka fake phyno .#gerarahere

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good for all. The boycot must hv taught them some lessons

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now they are talking..#LindaConfirm

    ReplyDelete
  11. okay ooo
    -D great anonymous now as Vivian Reginalds

    ReplyDelete
  12. DAUGHTER _ OF _ A _ SOMEBODY...23 January 2016 at 11:42

    #all hail JADA SMITH#









    I didn't type this fa' it just popped out...

    ReplyDelete
  13. This changes very little. This response came at all cos a woman was making the stand..as is the current trend in entertainment(ask JLAW and Taylor Swift). Whenever 'white' people react this promptly to a 'black' issue, U can be sure the outcome is to favor 'whites'. If black entertainment can lower it's tomfoolery and set up a parallel award institution/event(however modest) based purely on excellence...only den can dey get fair representation at the Oscars

    ReplyDelete
  14. RUBBISH. SO IF THERE WASN'T A WIDE CRY, THEY WOULDN'T HAVE DONE ANYTHING. THIS WOMAN PROMISED LAST YR ABOUT ADJUSTING IT BUT SAME ISH THIS YR

    ReplyDelete
  15. Finally someone stood up to rasicist Hollywood.

    ReplyDelete

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the views of Linda Ikeji.

Recent Posts